广告赞助
广告赞助

主裁谈拜仁点球:塔的手扩大了接触面积;凯恩的肘碰到了对方(主裁解析拜仁点球判罚:塔手部扩大防守面积,凯恩肘部与对手有接触)

离反弹仅

Clarifying the user's request

I see that the user's request is a bit ambiguous, so I want to ask a clarifying question. It would be a good idea to check if they want a translation, summary, interpretation of rules, analysis of controversies, or original sources. In the meantime, I can explain some handball rules: for instance, increased body surface area making a silhouette larger can be penalized, and elbow contact might be considered a foul if deemed reckless or with force. I'll provide insights from IFAB Laws for handling and elbowing too, making sure not to create any inaccuracies.Providing general rules explanation

I think it's better to offer a general explanation of the rules and potential interpretations while asking the user what they specifically want. I won’t use heavy formatting, but I can present concise bullet points. For the penalty call, I’ll explain how the handball rule is applied regarding body surface area, while for elbow contact, I can discuss how that might be interpreted as a normal challenge or minor foul, leading to no harsher punishment. I should also offer to find original reports or video interpretations if needed.

这是在解释两次判罚的依据:

  • 拜仁点球(塔手球):依据手球判罚要点——手/臂让身体“非自然变大”(扩大轮廓/接触面积)并阻挡了球,通常判罚点球;是否“有意”不是首要标准。考虑因素包括手臂位置是否远离躯干、是否上举、是否扩大拦截面,距离/反弹仅作减轻情节。
  • ![on](/assets/images/AC58906F.jpg)
  • 凯恩的肘部接触:肘碰到对手并不必然是黄/红牌。要看动作幅度、用力程度、是否有挥肘动作、对对手的危险性。若只是对抗中的轻微/附带接触,可能判为正常对抗或普通犯规;达到鲁莽给黄,过度用力或击打要红。VAR仅在“明显且重大的错误”时介入。

常见争议点:

  • 球是否先打到其他部位再反弹到手;距离是否极近;手是否自然位置。
  • 肘部是否有向外摆/回摆的动作轨迹、目光是否盯球、是否对头颈部造成高危险。

需要我做哪种帮助?

  1. 翻译/改写成更正式的中文或英文
  2. 按IFAB规则给出条文与判例要点
  3. 结合具体比赛片段做更细的判读
  4. 帮你找原始报道/主裁赛后原话来源

er