Clarifying user intent
I need to respond as a coding agent in the CLI. The user sent a Chinese sentence that resembles a news headline, but they haven't asked a direct question. It seems like they might want a summary or details about this news event. Since I can't browse, I should ask for clarification. I'll keep it friendly and concise and inquire if they want details, a summary, or perhaps an analysis or social media post related to it.Providing response options
I can reply to the user by asking for clarification on which match or incident they’re referring to. I’ll offer several options for their request, such as: 1) summarizing available public info, 2) drafting a social media post, 3) analyzing the Laws of the Game related to the incident, or 4) creating a template for an official explanation or timeline. I'll be concise and provide these options in a numbered list to make it easy for them to choose.Structuring the response
I’ll start by asking the user to specify the match, time, teams, or provide a link/screenshot for clarity. If they need a quick response, I can offer a general analysis instead.
I can highlight common types of misjudgments, such as offside rules, handball strictness, penalty thresholds, as well as VAR protocols related to clear errors and on-field reviews.
Additionally, I’ll offer to draft a 150-word summary, a social media post, a Q&A, or a referee analysis template, keeping everything concise with clear options.
你是想了解这次具体事件的详情，还是要我帮你梳理与撰写解读/评论？若能提供比赛场次、时间或关键画面描述（如越位、手球、点球、红牌、VAR介入点），我可以给到针对性的判例分析。先给你一个通用速览：
常见争议点：
- 越位：是否干扰对手/获得优势；“倒回第二次进攻机会”的判定边界
- 手球：手臂扩大化、手臂位置与身体运动的合理性；进攻手球与意外手球区分
- 点球阈值：轻微接触 vs 明显影响；守门员/后卫的动作性质
- 红牌：DOGSO（明显得分机遇）与SPA（战术犯规）区分；是否有控球可能
- VAR流程：仅纠正“明显且清晰”的重大错判；现场回看（OFR）何时介入
官方深夜说明通常包含：
- 逐事件说明（判罚依据、VAR音视频摘录）
- 执裁质量评估与可能的内部处理（停赛/降级）
- 后续改进（培训、指引口径统一、透明度提升）
需要我做哪种输出？给你几个选项，回个数字即可：
- 150字新闻速报稿（中立客观）
- 社媒短评/长帖（偏观点，含要点与金句） 
- 裁判技术解读（按LOTG/VAR协议逐条评估）
- 赛后QA模板（供俱乐部/媒体提问与回应）
- 写一份官方说明范本（含结构与措辞）